You know how that last reflection of mine on the Tampa affair went missing today? The one that was called “Imbibed reflection on Tampa affair”? I’ve been rationalising why I deleted it today and I’ve decided the act of deleting it represents my original point.
I’m not sure how to present a rational argument for a point that’s been actively deleted other than to make two points on either side of the curve it was sitting on and then produce a mathematically precise rule that states the disposition of the curve when plugged in to a threat of flippancy on the one hand and the algorithm of a third-person shooter on the other so as the curve goes through it.
Yes. I think that should just about do it.
“Every word is a symphony. Won’t you believe me?”