Imbibed reflection on Tampa affair: The second iteration

You know how that last reflection of mine on the Tampa affair went missing today? The one that was called “Imbibed reflection on Tampa affair”? I’ve been rationalising why I deleted it today and I’ve decided the act of deleting it represents my original point.

I’m not sure how to present a rational argument for a point that’s been actively deleted other than to make two points on either side of the curve it was sitting on and then produce a mathematically precise rule that states the disposition of the curve when plugged in to a threat of flippancy on the one hand and the algorithm of a third-person shooter on the other so as the curve goes through it.

Yes. I think that should just about do it.


“Every word is a symphony. Won’t you believe me?”

About these ads

About Brad

Braden Karl Frederiksen still has the small wooden treasure chest that his evil Grandmother gave him for his 8th Christmas. He can't recall how old he was when he locked the key inside nor how he locked it in there. He occasionally gives it a rattle and wonders what's making that other sound. View all posts by Brad

One response to “Imbibed reflection on Tampa affair: The second iteration

Follow Instructions on Top Card

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: